Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Cave

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Note that neither keep recommendation makes a valid argument, policy should be referred to. Rje 01:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dark Cave

Minor location, not much encylopaediac value. Fancruft. GSR 00:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Merge. I remember this location fondly, but it isn't even important enough to have a spot in the template. --Rhwawn talk to Rhwawn 03:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep its probably interesting for those interested in Pokemon. C56C 07:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or merge: Wikipedia is not a game guide. There have been a lot of recent Pokemon-related non-notable location articles. Cerulean City, for example, is notable. If there isn't enough encyclopedic information about a topic for it to ever progress beyond a stub, it should not have its own article. Dark Shikari 12:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as gamecruft; WP:NOT a game guide. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\= | 19:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)}
• Keep - half the articles on Wikipedia are game guides. Why exclude this one? GrapePie 20:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, gamecruft. And if half the articles on Wikipedia are game guides, delete them too. User:Angr 20:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and per User:Angr. Tychocat 10:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Tychocat. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.