Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Rousseau (Lost)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 05:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Danielle Rousseau (Lost)

• Delete. Completely duplicative of another article, Danielle Rousseau, over which an edit war has raged. Originator of the current page was blocked for WP:3RR on this previous article for two days, and his very first action on returning was (without discussion) to create this new page to cement his own stance on the previous article. Copyright issues also exist here but are secondary. This is a redundant article and should be deleted. PKtm 04:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Replication of information is pointless, particularly in the light of a reversion conflict.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as redundant content fork. Fagstein 06:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Normally I'd say "Merge into Characters of Lost," but it seems that page already has ample information on this character. --Hyperbole 06:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep As PKtm still assumes I am attempting to rage an edit war, even though I am not, I am upset to see him constantly marking my articles for deletion, especially one that would solve the current debate upon the Danielle Rousseau issue - Shaft121 07:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
  • How does unilaterally creating a duplicate article resolve a content dispute? Fagstein 18:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per PKtm. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 11:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, redundant. --Terence Ong 12:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Hyperbole, although the Characters of Lost page should probably be split, since it's an unwieldy chunk of text.
• Speedy Delete Danielle Rousseau already redirects to characters of Lost, this page is redundant. --Darkfred ^{Talk to me} 18:41, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as User:Fagstein  Funky Monkey  (talk)  19:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. —Leflyman^Talk 19:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wstaffor 23:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Fagstein. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(esperanza) 2006-04-20 07:46

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.