Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel burns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted (not by me}. -Doc ^ask? 23:18, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel burns

Non-notable person, no sources prove this. Gary Kirk 13:50, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, or even Speedy delete. "Renounded" isn't even a word, and I've seen a lot of these "so-and-so is gay" pages.Bjones 13:54, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. This sort of stuff is offensive. aliceinlampyland 14:55, 29 November 2005 (UTC).
• Speedy Delete as attack page --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 15:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Simple attack article. --StuffOfInterest 16:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• It probably means "renowned". It's not necessarily an attack page; "Peter Tatchell is gay" or "Elton John is a homosexual" are mere statements of fact, not attacks. Perhaps Daniel burns (sic) is in some way notable as someone who started the gay rights movement in the 1800s. However it's not possible to tell that from the article - it's devoid of useful content or context, and as such should be {{db-empty}} Speedy deleted, I'd say. Tonywalton  | Talk 16:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.