Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damien Kane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Damien Kane

Damien Kane (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Created by user:Damien Kane. I call that pure spam. -- RHaworth 03:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as autobiographical. MER-C 04:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete self-promotion. Seems to be using his userpage that way too. Opabinia regalis 05:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:AUTO, though I'm guessing that the person who actually wrote this is more likely to be a fan than the actual person. If the creator of the article was not user:Damien Kane, I'd probably vote keep per notable wrestler. --- RockMFR 06:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Notable wrestler, but delete per above. SupaStarGirl 14:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Notable wrestler, so Keep. I am the son of Damien Kane that happens to have the same name. I set up the user profile in honor of my father and wanted to transfer that info to an article as a school project because my father was a notable wrestler and I would like for him to be remembered for his contribution to wrestling. Damien Kane
• Keep: Notable wrestler. Deserves articles regardless of who created it. DCEdwards1966 17:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, WP:AUTO is not a criterion for deletion. Period. If that is the only violation, it should be kept. Were it a criterion, we would get the absurd scenario that an article's worth depends on how far its author chooses to identify themself. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 19:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Amarkov. --- RockMFR 19:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep on condition that someone produces sources. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 22:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:52, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.