Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daemonraco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- zzuuzz^(talk) 01:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Daemonraco

Daemonraco (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No established notability beyond an equally non-notable OSS library Eloquence* 00:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete; shouldn't have an article for the same reason the volunteer MediaWiki developers don't have articles – Qxz 00:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO and probably WP:COI since the authors name is User:Daemonraco.--John Lake 00:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Userfy and delete. User page contains nothing more than a link to this page. --Dennisthe2 00:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't meet requirements under WP:BIO. :^) §†SupaSoldier†§ 00:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable programmer. --Nevhood 01:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Completely fails notability.  V60 ^{VTalk · VDemolitions · Editor review 2!} 02:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 03:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO. No sources indicating notability. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Black Falcon (talk • contribs) 05:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC).
• Delete per above. PeaceNT 11:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Totally fails wp:bio. // 3R1C 14:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, by far. Warhorus 15:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no sources to assert his notability, which violates WP:BIO. - Anas ^Talk? 16:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Refs not properly formatted, spelling problems, fails WP:BIO and theres not even a stub template on it, not worth the trouble escpecially when it fails BIO.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 17:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• No claim of notability. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 19:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.