Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DSLua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 17:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DSLua

The project does not look notable Alex Bakharev 01:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. Turgidson 02:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, not to mention there will probably never be WP:RS on this -- feb^talk 03:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete I don't think it is notable either, however there seems to be quite some mention of it on the internets. James086^Talk 13:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as the article is notable. I did some clean up but more is probably needed. ZimmerBarnes 14:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:SOFTWARE, not a directory of all software and this scripting language appears to lack notability. Warfieldian 22:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep but expand. Seems notable enough, but more information is needed. » K i G O E | talk 05:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 13:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Rewrite from scratch. DSLua is a port of the Lua scripting language to the Nintendo DS. The article should, at the very least, mention this essential fact. Besides, nobody but the developers of DSLua care about the development details; the article should talk about the language itself, its differences (if any) to standard Lua, and other technical facts. LGMᚂ 14:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or merge into Lua (programming language) until such time as encyclopedic and independently sourced content can be found. Right now it reads like a gossip column for nerds. —David Eppstein 07:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.