Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJDownload.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] DJDownload.com

Advert for nonnotable website. NawlinWiki 14:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Spam. Non-notable, horrible Alexa. Fails WP:WEB by a mile. Fan-1967 14:50, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. TexMurphy 14:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. I'm happy to see this speedied. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

well... thanks for the sharp and rather unjust decision on your collective parts to vote for the removal of "djdownload.com". If you would kindly take the time to find out a little bit more about DJdownload then you may realise that it is an important part of DJ culture her in the ol' UK, and if you insist on its removal then I suggest that you review and delete "Beatport", Sony Connect, and all the other Online music stores on Wikipedia. Beatport in particular cares to mention (purely for research purposes i'm sure...) the prices of its download on the same wiki article!

"Isn’t music the best human invention ever?" - quote, Theresa Knott —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Djdownloadadmin (talk • contribs).

I standby that quote. However this isn't about music, it's about using wikipedia in order to advertise, and that I am not happy about at all. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB. Hi, Djdownloadadmin. I'm sure your website is very nice and very helpful to those who use it, but by our guidelines (read WP:WEB in particular), it just doesn't merit its own article. These editors (and myself) have researched it (Fan-1967 looked at the Alexa ranking, which is a criterion, the nominator certainly did the same, and on my part, I did a google search and a news search). Srose (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity per name of creator. Danny Lilithborne 00:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete it per nom, and lock it down. wikipediatrix 01:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:SPAM and WP:WEB - Blood red sandman 15:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.