Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cycle synchrony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was move, merge and redirect; delete cycle synchrony. Johnleemk | Talk 12:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cycle synchrony

This article is

1. misleading, as the common scholarly use of "cycle synchrony" is something else [1]
2. essentially a one man's theory
3. short enough to be merged into Edward R Dewey.

See also this TfD.

After reaching consensus on this article, more articles, like Cycle studies and War cycles may need our attention.

Proposed action: Merge, no redirect.

Alternative action: Move to Cycle synchrony (Dewey), deleting the redirect at Cycle synchrony. Then merge and redirect to Edward R Dewey.

Pjacobi 20:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect as per nom.--nixie 03:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.