Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cummalism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by AlisonW as nonsense. — TheKMan^talk 19:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cummalism

No Google hits. Certainly non-notable and almost certainly a hoax, unless someone out there's actually turning sophomoric giggling at the mention of sex into an actual religion. Because, y'know, they cum a lot. Ha ha! Blinding wit! Captain Disdain 13:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per my own nomination. -- Captain Disdain 13:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Despite its sparkling humour, my humours today are such that I am inclined to think that this quasi-vandalistic non-notable article should be deleted. --maru (talk) contribs 13:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete But it does bring new meaning to the song "O Come All Ye Faithful" Wildthing61476 13:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism and per what Wikipedia is WP:NOT (dictionary, things made up in school one day). - Tangotango 14:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for being a great big steaming load of bright green hairy bollocks. Vizjim 14:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. --Xyrael ^T 17:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Gosh, that's an awfully seductive religious doctrine... delete NawlinWiki 17:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• No Delete I've actually heard about it. I think it sounds stupid, but hey, its what people believe—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Greenfairy2909 (talk • contribs) .
• No Delete No, this isn't a joke. I know one of the "prophets" of this religion. If it is a joke, he's pretty into it. All he does all day is write for that gospel. They have about a hundred followers now. and for the guy that laughed about the Cum a lot thing, its pronounced cuum, like in Vacuum, or Cum Laude, which is Latin like it says in the article—The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChalieBrownChristmas (talk • contribs) .

• No DeleteI am a strong believer in cummalism, and I think your intolerance is disgusting. They can't prove Christianity, either, and if you just heard of that it'd sound like alot of bull. Yes, there is sex in our religion, that's how Father Gawd reproduces which is why we reproduce like that: because he made us. Just because you dont' believe in it doesn't mean it's fake. and that's really stupid, that whole cum a lot thing. it's cUm, like doom, and it has two m's in it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DwindlingDuck (talk • contribs) .

dont delete this or ill kick u in the nuts—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.37.97.246 (talk • contribs) .

More reasons why this NEEDS to go right there. Stop with the insults and the threats and you'd stand a better chance. Wildthing61476 18:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete. Complete and utter nonsense/hoax. There is no possible way for this article to improve beyond its current abysmal form. — TheKMan^talk 19:15, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.