Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuerdon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep --Ichiro 05:49, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cuerden

nn? My village Rastrick gets a small entry because of its brass band, but I've never heard of Cuerdon, and all I know is that Leyland is near Blackpool Sceptre ^(Talk) 17:32, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Verifiable place Lancashire - a strong Wiki traditionis to keep places/settlements. Expand. Dlyons493 Talk 17:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep real place Jcuk 18:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, however I think this article's title is misspelt. In the List of civil parishes in Lancashire "Cuerden" is listed as being in Chorley, in Lancashire. Similarly, searching streetmap.co.uk for the GB Place "Cuerdon" turns up nothing, but "Cuerden" turns up possibilities (is Cuerden the same as Cuerden Green?). Rename? Sliggy 19:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but rename and tidy. Accvording to the best maps I've got, Cuerden Green is just outside Leyland, but in the direction of Bamber Bridge, not Chorley. (i.e., north of Leyland, not southeast). Cuerden Hall seems to be located nearby, and both are close to junction 29 of the M6. Multimap puts Cuerden itself in the same place. There seems to be a Cuerden Valley Park there, presumably on the River Lostock. Grutness...wha? 00:09, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, rename, and expand – Seancdaug 06:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Now renamed. -- RHaworth 11:18, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.