Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown of Immortality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-01 08:40Z

[edit] Crown of Immortality

Crown of Immortality (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

OR, personal essay, term is not generally used in iconography, symbolism taken from Christian-mystic websites, conspiracy theory about EU flag —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paul111 (talk • contribs).

Stop nagging Paul111, I'm onto getting more source proof, as the once already there does not satisfy you. The term "Crown of Immortality" exist, what's the problem? Conspiracy? Drop it! --Roberth Edberg 15:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

• keep There are certainly problems with the article. But the article is very new (last week only); and the creator is a new editor (also only a week), who has promised to provide more background and sources shortly. He also agreed to take out some of the more problematic stuff (e.g. EU-flag similarity). Hence I think this article deserves at least a fair chance to develop. Arnoutf 16:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I agree you should have put on a prod tag as opossed to just deletion. That would have given the aithor a chance top back up his work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LordKal1 (talk • contribs).— LordKal1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment Actually a prod was set up, but as that implies an uncontroversial deletion after a short period unless protest is raised, I removed it leaving motivation on the article talk page. Arnoutf 16:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Most of the contentious content has been removed, and a new more general article created. A merge with that article can close this discussion. (A merge must wait for AfD closure).Paul111 11:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep separate on the whole. This item should have been listed as a Visual-arts related AfD, which I will now do. Although the article is still poor, it does cite enough examples to demonstrate a Modern classical-myth iconographic concept of a Crown of Immmortality (also see for example this, if you have a subscription or good eyesight [1]) . This is separate from the religious concepts, let alone the EU - best left out of both articles in my view, unless a specific connection can be demonstrated. Btw please note there is now Category:Iconography. Johnbod 18:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep What a wonderful reference link example you make out of it. If you were interested in reading you of course would have found out that the reading is made easier just by clickin enlarge page. --Roberth Edberg 19:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Looks documented/referenced/cited/attributed now. [>>sparkit|TALK<<] 20:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep There's good stuff here- this article just needs a bit of time. *Mishatx*-In\Out 04:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. Johnbod 18:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.