Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Schultz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cristina Schultz

WP:BIO Subject not notable. Newsworthy for a while, perhaps, but Standford graduate and alleged high-classed prostitute hardly deserves to have a Wiki listing? Ohconfucius 08:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. It's not a matter of deserving but rather of reference value. She is likely to be referred to in any discussion of debt levels from student loans (as well as being an example of why it is a bad idea to brag in public about your earnings without declaring them on your income tax return). Icky people sometimes have reference value. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 09:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - properlt referenced and notorious enough to be notable. -- Whpq 13:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete She wont be cited on this side of the Atlantic and I'm not sure she'll be cited for long (if at all) on that side. Insufficiently notable, tomorrow's wrapping for a Fish n Chips supper... Marcus22 13:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 15 minutes of fame don't notable make. --Svartalf 16:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep she received quite a bit of news coverage and her name still comes up in conversations about the massive debt that student loans can put people in-like this article from Stanford. Agne 16:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.