Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craplet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 14:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Craplet

Craplet (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was recreated after first Prod deletion, so now I'm brining it here. It's not a real term, only a slang term used in a few sources. Does not qualify as encyclopedic per WP:NEO. Probably not suitable for wikitionary either. Also remember to delete redirect page Craplets since the page was copied from there (should have been moved). Danski14 17:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• Possible redirect to shovelware? Sounds like a related concept if not absolutely the same. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, or maybey even better, merge into Software bloat. Danski14 19:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's already discussed there. Is there someway I can withdraw this AfD? Or I guess we can just leave it up and see if anyone else has any better ideas. Danski14 21:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

You can withdraw it and either close it yourself or have someone else do it, but who knows, maybe during the AfD someone will improve it. It can't hurt to let it go awhile. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Oops, I didn't know you could move a page. Anyways, I think you're right about the article not qualifying as encyclopedic, but I think that the practice of computer manufacturers loading up new computers with trial versions of applications (and receiving money from the application companies to do so) should be mentioned somewhere on Wikipedia. The question is which article is most appropriate. I put my vote in for Software bloat. WatchAndObserve 01:17, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cbrown1023 talk 02:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Hehe I almost forgot about this. Well, I think we should redirect to Software bloat. That article already mentions the term and explains the phenomena. We can also use the references there. Danski14 04:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete neologism per WP:NEO. --Charlene 12:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as repost of already deleted article. dcandeto 17:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as neologism, move to Wiktionary--Absurdist 02:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.