Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackin' Good Snacks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Crackin' Good Snacks

Non-notable product; no chance of satisfying WP:CORP. Valrith 20:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Agreed; non-notable. - Triviaa 21:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Appears both non-notable and unverifiable. Original research. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c e} 23:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. I used to eat this brand for years and years. Unverifiable? I just did a Google search and found plenty of verification. It's a long-running and well known Winn-Dixie house brand, therefore it is notable. WP:CORP does not apply to a brand name, it applies to the company who makes it, and Winn-Dixie certainly passes. wikipediatrix 00:13, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Really? Because I googled for it and found 8 unique hits. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk | BT sites} 02:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Putting the unnecessary word "snacks" in there is holding back hits. I searched "Crackin' Good" and added "Winn-Dixie" to filter out unrelated results. [1] I also tried "bakery" as an extra search term. [2] The quantity of hits don't matter as much here anyway, because the hits we do have verify that this company makes products that have (or had, in their heyday) nationwide distribution for decades in a very popular grocery chain. It's as much a no-brainer as Chek soda. wikipediatrix 04:51, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. Ultra-Loser ^{Talk | BT sites} 02:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.