Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption in Mumbai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep (I added a {{cleanup}} tag, though). Robert ^{T | @ | C} 02:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Corruption in Mumbai

POV rant. User:Zoe|^(talk) 05:00, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. legitimate topic. Should move to Corruption in Mumbai --Vsion 05:32, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Neutral. Legitimate topic, extremely POV, looks like original research. Sadly, this may be the work of an earnest person on a crusade for the greater good. I hope the press picks up the issue. Better suited for a private website. Durova 05:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Rant at present but needs some editing to get more matter of fact and neutral. That will take some time as i collect my thoughts and get time to edit the page. Anyway even if it is deleted, just let me know so that i save it somewhere else. Thanks.

• You should save a copy now. When it is deleted, it will be too late. --Vsion 06:44, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

• This page may be relevant for tourists and foreign institutional investors. Unless these issues begin to be addressed, the increasing misgovernance will cause problems for future investors in the long run as crime and instability increase.User:Hiphop2 10 Nov 2005
  • Comment As a major contributor to the article, you should mention that connection when commenting here. - Dalbury (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It is highly POV but it only needs someone with knowledge in that area to fix it. A1kmm 10:22, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

I do agree. The article requires encyclopedic 'touch'. --Bhadani 13:56, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

KEEP I think that this article proves to me one of the few measures to compile and distribute information on corruption amongst other Indians in general and thus remains as a trivial process in the eradication of it. I feel that the article shows what is done and the problems with it so that future generations can improve in the process. The article provides vital information to many people who, though they have a high loyalty to the Tiranga, are illiterate in this particular subject. Thus, I strongly state that this article should be kept at any and all costs. If, however, you do decide to remove this article, please contact me so that I can save a copy of it somewhere else. -- Koyla 20:55, 10 November 2005

• Moved article to correct capitalization -- no vote on delete/keep. --Quasipalm 15:38, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep but it could really do with a clean up and some wikification. --Apyule 09:16, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.