Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copia (Latin)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 05:04, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copia (Latin)

Appears to be more appropriate for wiktionary, if it should exist at al as a separate article. Delete or Transwiki. --Nlu (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• delete as unresolvably and incoherently OR, but more importantly, this article touches on the fact that we appear to have no article for the Roman god of the same name. This should be rectified. -Harmil 01:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• delete unless this can be sourced. As it sits, it looks like OR. It could be a draft from a college essay. A pity, it would make a facinating article it were just coherent. :) Dlohcierekim 19:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • I've left a note on the creator's talk page. Perhaps it can be saved? :) Dlohcierekim 19:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.