Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confederation of Hackers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Yanksox 21:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Confederation of Hackers

Couple of weeks ago I saw the "linkless" tag on this page and I tried to do something about it. Now people have gotten tag-happy and my work on that article was all for nothing. I abstain from voting in this debate. Plinth molecular gathered 14:57, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I'd like to know more about this topic, but the official website is hopelessly confusing and not meant for the casual onlooker. Robert Happelberg 22:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable RPG with extremely small community of players. ShutterBugTrekker 23:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Neutral Right now it is difficult for me to assess the notability or non-notability of this RPG. Anton Mravcek 17:49, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Valrith and Percy Snoodle's arguments have convinced me to change my vote to delete. Anton Mravcek 22:38, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Google search for `"Confederation of Hackers" +MMORPG` yields 21 hits, 2 of which are from Wikipedia, 2 of which are from the game/site itself, and none of which contains any information about the game/site. The game/site itself is in a less-than-beta release condition by its own admission, and the site has no alexa ranking. In short, there appears to be no trace of notability per WP:WEB, and no means of reaching verifiability via reliable sources. Valrith 18:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN online forum; fails WP:WEB Percy Snoodle 19:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, consistent with my tagging the article with {{prod2}}. As an aside to the nominator, please bear in mind the caution always posted on the edit page: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." Your bitterness is a bit exaggerated, as the edit history[1][2] reveals you did very little to the article. Agent 86 18:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable. - CNichols 21:44, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.