Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condalangus Rice

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:58, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Condalangus Rice and Condolangus Rice

Not encyclopaedic. --fvw* 20:43, 2005 Jan 18 (UTC)

• Redirect to Condoleezza Rice --BesigedB ^(talk) 21:47, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Should be speedy deleted. -- Curps 22:18, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete This would have been a sensible choice for "Speedy Delete": note the amount of time this process will cost sensible Wikipedians, below. --Wetman 22:40, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Another joke that was made into an article. Encyclopedias do not tell jokes. -R. fiend 22:44, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • An encyclopedia walks into a bar and says, "delete". - RedWordSmith 00:30, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Gazpacho 22:52, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Do not redirect intentionally offensive misspellings. Should have been speedy deleted. 22:54, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Above vote by User:RickK
    • Whoops, sorry about that. RickK 23:53, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect. Samaritan 23:22, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no redirect. Jpo 23:52, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to comedian Dave Chappelle and do not redirect. No need to have a seperate entry on a single possibly offensive joke. Mgm|^(talk) 08:58, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Offensive spellings should not be a redirect. Jayjg | (Talk) 22:38, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Do not delete, Wikipedia is meant to contain all human knowledge, and I'm sure that whoever created this article is a great guy.
  • Above vote is by the anon IP (24.166.6.140 | talk | contributions) who created this article. -- Curps 22:55, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • And one minute after voting, he created Condolangus Rice. Wonderful. -- Curps 22:58, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • "Wikipedia is meant to contain all human knowledge"??? Where do people come up with this crap? -R. fiend 04:08, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
    • Possibly a quote from that guy Jimbo Wales: [1] Kappa 06:04, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
      • And clearly not meant to be taken literally, or we wouldn't have a VfD page for anything except for utter nonsense. "My back hurts" is knowledge possessed by humans (me and my doctor) and therefore human knowledge, but no one would suggest including it in wikipedia. -R. fiend 18:32, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
        • Besides, what he actually said is that Wikipedia is meant to contain the "sum of all human knowledge", which is a different thing entirely. There is an infinite amount of human knowledge; just because we list the numbers 1 and 2 doesn't mean we also need to list all the real numbers in between them. Though some of the list-makers here might want to try. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:02, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
        • But this is not nonsense. This is part of the sum of human knowledge. This should be in Wikipedia, Wikipedia should have articles on ALL topics. *Do Not Delete.
          • The above comment once again is by the original creator of the page, (24.166.6.140 | talk | contributions), with edit summary response to the stupid people. I suppose your edits to Pastrami and Stromboli (sophomoric puns about Strom Thurmond) also contribute to human knowledge? -- Curps 23:11, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
            • I think that you're hitting below the belt, Curps. That attack is nothing but partisan politics. Rice and Thurmond may be conservatives, and you may be a liberal, but you still have to show some respect. It is disrespectful to the late Senator.
              • The above was (24.166.6.140 | talk | contributions) again. What on Earth are you talking about? You added links to Strom Thurmond to the pages Pastrami and Stromboli, which I reverted. You are establishing that you are a mere vandal, and any future pages you create should be speedily deleted. -- Curps 01:11, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
                • I'm no vandal! How dare you make such accusations! This page is worth viewing! I also created the page on Desire (album) and I added stuff the article on Oreos. Why can't you just leave my page alone! It's a good page! I'm just trying to honor my Senator and the soon to be Sec. of State. -- Potatoeman57
                  • Did not create Desire (album). Also apparently uses User:Potatoeman56. Other usernames as well? -- Curps 01:48, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete . Mikkalai 01:20, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Dave Chappelle, no redirect. Megan1967 01:50, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, no redirect. LizardWizard 01:54, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Josh Cherry 02:48, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, and hopefully the Senate will also "delete" Condoleeza Rice. --Stevietheman 18:32, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I get the feeling by reading all of the other changes that this user makes that he/she is a vandal and possibly a racist. I say delete it and everything that he/she does.-----Keetoowah 16:21, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, with no redirect; the only "errors" a redir could correct are made in bad faith. --Jerzy(t) 03:52, 2005 Jan 23 (UTC)
• Delete. This isn't a notable nickname, and it's not a misspelling one might reasonably chance upon. Also, while I don't want to be picky, voters need to remember that a vote of "merge, no redirect" is impossible, as doing so would violate our GFDL-mandated obligation to recognise contributors (however foolish) whose contributions we retain. -- John Fader 03:57, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete (both articles) --RoySmith 19:45, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• I change my vote to Delete -Potatoeman57

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.