Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concierge medicine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deletion log states Sir Nicholas de Mimsy-Porpington deleted "Concierge medicine" (G11). Navou ^banter 10:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Concierge medicine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This could possibly be a valid subject but has been written as advertising for one business and would require considerable clean up to meet Wikipedia standards Random Passer-by 23:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Concierge medicine

• Delete This is an essay, designed as a promotional exercise for a specific service, which makes it WP:SPAM as well.--Anthony.bradbury 23:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It's a valid topic. Yes it needs some extensive clean-up, but that's not a reason to delete. --John24601 00:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. It may indeed be a valid topic. If so, it can be re-created when someone puts in the necessary time to create an acceptable article on the topic. It should not be preserved in its current form in the hopes that someone might stumble across it and do so. Soltak | Talk 00:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G11 and so tagged. This article written by single purpose account ConciergeDoc, is an advertorial, which necessitates cleanup effort disproportionate to rebuild from scratch. Delete without prejudice for re-creation as encyclopaedic article. Ohconfucius 08:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.