Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comic Book Rumbles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comic Book Rumbles

Totally nonnotable messageboard on a website not notable enough for its own article. Vanity fancruft, self-promotional from extended number of links. Board doesn't do anything that hundreds of other boards not listed here also do. DreamGuy 01:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per above. DreamGuy 01:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete blatant vanispamcruftvertisement. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• p.s.: althought the site's 100-odd links in from Wikipedia articles lights up the spam radar, Wikipedia is not the top referrer and its Alexa rank is 8621, so although the forum is obviously not independently notable, and this article is vile, the comicbookresources.com site would almost certainly qualify under WP:WEB (whether it would continue to qualify if the 100+ links were removed is, of course, a different matter). - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 17:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete We can use Cruft-tanite. There are billions and billions of boards like this. Dominick ^(TALK) 17:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Perfecto 03:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not quite (by a longshot) notable enough for WP. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 00:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Entry erased by snob jerks.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.