Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Collarme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Notable with the community is not really easy to verify, and nominator has hard numbers. Herostratus 06:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Collarme

Non-notable website (alexa rank today 8142, 3 mo. avg. 5399); no evidence of satisfying WP:WEB Valrith 20:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete there are no cited sources. Without external coverage we can't verify much beyond it's mere existence, which is insufficient. Guy 20:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Guy. Thryduulf 22:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - it's notable within its community (admittedly, sexual perverts). - Richardcavell 00:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

That's fine, if you can prove it. Truth by assertion usually doesn't hold up... Valrith 00:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry that I haven't a library of BDSM academic journals at my house to pull citations from. - Richardcavell 00:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.