Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodeweaversLtd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:01, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CodeweaversLtd
This article fails WP:CORP. None of the 26 unique search hits for the company name and "motor finance" raise the level of notability to encyclopedic levels. Erechtheus 21:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Codeweavers article should stay
This was a short article to illustrate the facts about Codeweavers ltd as a company. It is claimed the the article should be deleted due to it not conforming with WP:CORP, but in the WP:CORP it states that:
A company or corporation is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:
1. The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.
Codeweavers has been the subject of several published works, most recently an article by 'Automotive Managment magazine' discussing Codeweavers ltd and it's Parent company Jigsaw finance ltd involvement in the new 'Utopian' motor finance concept. Codeweavers Ltd have also featured in other magazines such as 'Motor Matters magazine'.
If proof of these publications is required, please request.
In closing, the Codeweavers ltd article in Wikipedia should be allowed to remain as it it a valid and relevant article. Neilbeardmore 14:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Spamvertisecruft. Robertissimo 17:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- !!!Keep it!!! It doesn't look like spam, and they fill the criteria to be listed. Let it stay. Pawelkaminski 08:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
