Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closing logos of Hanna-Barbera
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. I do not think the basis for deletion given in the nomination and "per nom" vote is correct: it is emphatically not original research, on the assumption that the article isn't completely fabricated. Tregoweth gives no reason for deletion at all: either he is agreeing with the (incorrect) nomination or it is impossible to weigh this one remaining vote (for such it is) against the single keep, who actually gives good reasons for keeping it. There is the reference to non-encyclopedic in the nomination, but this is not given any backing either by the nominator or by the other deleters. Perhaps a better nomination and more persausive deletion arguments in a renomination are required. (Note that during the time I wrote this closure, some irrelevant comments were removed from the bottom of the debate [1].) -Splashtalk 22:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Closing logos of Hanna-Barbera
Almost completely original research, and not encyclopedic as well.--FuriousFreddy 22:59, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Rogerd 00:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Keep As I'm an inclusionist, interested in geeky articles like this. If its possible to host this on some wikicities and link to this from the main page I'd be for it, but since Wikipedia isn't paper, there's no reason to delete stand alone articles that contain information, that interests some people.--Nick Dillinger 09:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. tregoweth 22:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
