Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City Pharmacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani^talk 17:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] City Pharmacy

This article reads like a press release, is entirely unsourced, and unlinked. Wikipedia is not a hosting service provider. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rcnet (talk • contribs) 05:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Needs development, but seems to meet notability, even though PPNG is a small country.--Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 16:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I disagree entirely. How has notability been established? LittleOldMe 18:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Nothing of encyclopedic value. LittleOldMe 18:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• The original content of the article, written in the first person, was the same advertisement as one can find self-submitted to other web sites, such as here, for example. Although it has since been pared down, the article still requires a complete rewrite from scratch, citing sources. However, there don't appear to be the sources available. The article itself doesn't cite any. Looking for non-trivial published works from sources independent of the company and its founders/officers turns up exactly 1 article: this. Other articles, such as this, are about other things (in this case, a school football league), and only address the company tangentially. That's not enough to satisfy the WP:CORP criteria. Delete. Uncle G 19:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no reliable sources indicating notability per WP:CORP. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this dreadful PR exercise. WMMartin 18:01, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.