Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincymusic.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cincymusic.com

nn/local site, spammy, alexa rating of 1,379,309, not useful here Giant onehead 00:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. This site is particularly useful because it provides information on bands that Wikipedia is reluctant to list because of WP:MUSIC. --TruthbringerToronto (talk • contribs • logs) 01:21, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable website. Why would we keep an article about a non-notable website because it documents non-notable bands? That makes no sense. Opabinia regalis 01:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN. Whether it is a "good site" or not is no matter for this vote. Its notability that counts. Arbusto 02:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:33, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails to assert notability. MER-C 08:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't see why we should have an article to spite WP:MUSIC, makes no sense to me. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no notability asserted. And it's not even named Kinkymusic. =) JIP | Talk 09:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above.UberCryxic 17:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. Prolog 22:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 04:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. Yamaguchi先生 04:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.