Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciao (website)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ifnord 16:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ciao (website)

This article does note meet the criteria for inclusion. meatclerk 23:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

• Extremely Strong Keep This company is highly notable as is demonstrated by the articles that have been published about it in the link below
• [[1]]

The Parent company 'Greenfield' is also listed on NASDAQ. Supposed 19:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

• Extremely Strong Keep Ciao is a significant price engine, and that's a big service that needs coverage on Wikipedia. Blowski 20:46 (GMT), 24 July 2006.
• Strong Keep, in spite of the incorrect "keep" reasoning above. (Many of the "press sources" listed on the company site are less notable than Ciao, itself.) However, there are multiple press references, both as a price engine and as a consumer review web site. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.