Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chukwu octuplets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chukwu octuplets

Is being an octuplet enough to warrant inclusion? Delete as being non-notable! Bjelleklang - talk 11:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I think their listing in the Multiple birth article is sufficient. PJM 12:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Being an octuplet may not be notable for inclusion, but being the first set in which any members survive infancy confers notability on the set. Dsmdgold 23:08, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. This case is very significant. Anthony Appleyard 17:15, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Dsmdgold assuming that that claim can be verified. JoshuaZ 06:10, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep 2 CNN references at least. Kotepho 07:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.