Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christos Coins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as original research and blatant advertising. --²¹⁰physicq (c) 02:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christos Coins

Christos Coins (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Tagged no references since July; none have been added, and given the scarcity of google hits etc. I suspect none are likely to be forthcoming. Unverifiable and original research. Chick Bowen 03:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• Pwn - Per nom and WP:AN comments on spam magnets. (It has been orphaned since its creation as well.) PTO 03:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• BJAODN I somehow thik it is funny. SYSS Mouse 04:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• It's a conspiracy, dude. :) PTO 04:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Sorry guys but we have been attempting to update this site for some weeks. Be patient - this is not easy for new users!!! Many more links and updates are sitting ready to go! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anna Jackman (talk • contribs) 04:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC).

• Wow, I was like >< close to prodding it myself for spam/lack of notability. :) (oh yeah, delete). Patstuart^talk|edits 07:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, NOR, thanks, bye bye. Proto::► 10:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as original research.-- danntm ^T _C 17:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Hoaxalicious. RFerreira 17:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per the commenters above. Yamaguchi先生 00:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 09:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This kind of advertorial makes my flesh creep. WMMartin 16:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and add special seasonings. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.