Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Monism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Avi 16:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Monism

This article appears to be WP:NEO. In itself, the article states that the term is "is found within" the book A Course in Miracles however, it doesn't cite the book itself as reference, and being mentioned only once in one book is hardly any reason to believe it should have an article for itself. The phrase itself only shows 477 hits on Google. Ste4k 06:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Merge/redirect to A Course In Miracles--TBCTaLk?!? 06:26, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to A Course In Miracles. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 09:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or possibly merge to ACIM, but even a merge and redirect is likely giving undue credence to this neologism. WP:NEO says avoid them. I read that as delete. Just zis Guy you know? 12:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NEO. Tevildo 13:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and JzG. — Haeleth Talk 13:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable neologism. Merging would still acknowledge the neologism, which is against WP:NEO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 20:13, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable neologism.--Nick Y. 21:50, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable concept. SM247^{My Talk} 01:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Term is used by Schubert Ogden, a fairly well-known theologian, in articles Lurker 10:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment The article as currently written is about the neologism, but the term itself (with a different meaning) is used by Ogden, and is in the title of at least one book published in 1923. [1][2] The term in this other sense would not have "Monism" capitalized, however. Gimmetrow 00:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.