Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Ethics and US Government Policy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 04:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Christian Ethics and US Government Policy
Delete. I don't think that this article could possibly be rewritten in a NPOV. Even with cited sources, this article also seems to be OR. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 talk contribs Count 01:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Is there an essay "Wikipedia is not a soapbox"? Should be, and this is why. Akradecki 01:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- See WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wow...there actually is...guess I should have looked there! Thanks! Akradecki 16:33, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- See WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, reads like an essay. VegaDark 01:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete soap box. Arbusto 01:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Original thought. With a POV-baiting title like that, it will never be anything else. --IslaySolomon 02:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. per nom. Stubbleboy 03:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete may be a good sub-section of politics or government, but it is way to POV as it is.Mad$ 05:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Can never conform to WP:NPOV and is a non-encyclopedic topic. --JaimeLesMaths 07:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NOT a soapbox. --Terence Ong (T | C) 09:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, essay-like, which makes it original research Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 10:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete POV and "soapbox-ish". bernlin2000 ∞ 15:35, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.