Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Schlosberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 23:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Chris Schlosberg

self-proclaimed lack of notability, failing WP:MUSIC Dweller 21:38, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, because Wikipedia is the world's greatest encyclopedia, not the world's greatest non-encyclopedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kevomatic (talk • contribs).
  • ^{User's 21st edit. SushiGeek 21:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)}
• power has corrupted you, my friend —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.3.89.196 (talk • contribs).
  • Comment I have no power. If the community disagrees with me, the article will stay. However, the community also wrote and approved WP:MUSIC and this article blatantly fails the criteria given there. Please don't feel you've been targeted. You're clearly new to Wikipedia. Read the articles I put on your talk page and you'll get a better idea of what Wikipedia is about. And what is it not --Dweller 21:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. SushiGeek 21:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Borderline A7 - considering the content, I suspect a hoax. Tevildo 21:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • its no hoax, i know the guy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.3.89.196 (talk • contribs).
  • hay, you deleted another of my comments, you must be real proud of yourself —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.3.89.196 (talk • contribs).
• Speedy delete and so tagged -- article asserts that subject is "little-known". And I don't see any evidence that any of 75.3.89.196's comments have been deleted. NawlinWiki 21:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Two personal attacks were deleted, namely 'why must you be such fgts' and 'enjoy mom's basement much?' SushiGeek 21:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I see -- sorry. You were right to delete them. NawlinWiki 21:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• I am an inclusionist. I don't want to see anything deleted in Wikipedia if information is lost. However, there is no proof beyond this Wiki entry that this person and their releases exist (I'm not always a believer in Google hits to establish notability, but in this case, there is nothing). Delete. Parsssseltongue 22:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.