Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choco Orta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep rewritten version. - Mailer Diablo 09:04, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Choco Orta

Delete per nomination. The reasons that I'm nominating this page for deletion is because it seems more of an advertisement by EXCLUSIVE WORLDWIDE MANAGEMENT, then an article. NPOV, Fax Numbers, e-mail and newspaper reviews Tony the Marine 15:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup. Google thinks that this she is a notable Puerto Rican musician, but the EXCLUSIVE WORLDWIDE MANAGEMENT ads and the Spanish translation should be removed. Andrew pmk | Talk 03:15, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If this guy needs an article someone can write one from scratch. This one is utter crap. -R. fiend 22:00, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
• Relisting. Needs more eyeballs. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 08:26, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete She may be notable enough in a few years, but not quite just yet. Bwithh 09:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• 'Comment Allmusic.com shows her as having released a couple of albums see [1]

This music of Puerto Rico article indicates that she is fairly significant in their music industry. [2] This Latin Beat magazine article states that she has performed overseas including in France [3]. In my view, she is notable enough under WP:music but this article is of little value in its current state. I would vote to keep a decent stub. Capitalistroadster 10:13, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: I stubified a large article, and I suggest people look at the old version before they vote, since the current version doesn't include most of the details (which I haven't had a chance to verify). Also, I won't complain if somebody undoes what I did, and works with the old version. I might have gone to far, but I didn't see the old content being a good basis for an article. --rob 11:07, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Well done to Rob for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster 11:19, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. It's a squeaker, and a case could be made either way on this, since so much of the "press" on her is purely promotional. But, the CDs, minor film roles, and touring can be beleived, even if the hype is discounted. --rob 11:48, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep recycled version. Alf ^melmac 12:08, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep with the rewrites. --MacRusgail 16:55, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep the rewrites and expand them further down the line. Thanks for your work, rob. --Jacquelyn Marie 03:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.