Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chisato Amate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 14:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chisato Amate

The following is copied from WP:SD: —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 13:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

was a page on a japanese actress. i'd saved a first state and was in the middle of getting info for the second when it was deleted by User:Lucky 6.9 with the rationale "So-and-so is an actress. It's also a weblink placeholder. Other than that, it's just groovy." it contained date and place of birth, kanji for the subjects name, and a filmography -- all three things IMDb currently lacks. my personal feeling is that if Luck 6.9 truly felt it should have been deleted it should have been listed in afd. Nateji77 09:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment There are many actors and actresses on WP. What has this person done to make themselves notable? The article makes no claims, WP:BIO refers for an outline of what is notable.  (aeropagitica)  13:45, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, legitimate movie actress. Kappa 18:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Short articles with little or no content can be deleted. Doesn't take a bureaucracy, after all.  :) I'm not against an article on this actress, but this one should have had a lot more effort put forth. Abstain unless it remains in the state it's in. - Lucky 6.9 19:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • "little or no content" is still not a speedy criterion. Kappa 19:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Under WP:CSD a very short article with little or no context is liable for speedy deletion. At the moment, this article is in such a state. We don't know whether whether Ms Amate played a significant role in these films or was an extra. In order to meet WP:BIO, she would need to have played fairly significant roles. Her IMDb shows she has featured in two films in its database including one roll in top billing. That makes her notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 00:57, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
• Article expanded a bit - needs more work. Capitalistroadster 01:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.