Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chillax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:00, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chillax
- An article that looks to me like promotion of a coined word as recently as last year. Delete. Georgia guy 01:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Transwiki to Wiktionary. I don't think it deserves a Wikipedia entry but I have heard it used by quite a few people. Wasn't it even on The OC or something? Cyde Weys 01:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - neologism. Ruby 01:55, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete — Perhaps a good candidate for urbandictionary, but otherwise, delete per WP:NFT 142.151.184.210 02:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all the above (apart from maybe the transwiki bit, as I don't think they'll want it) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]
AfD? 20:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC) - Delete. How is this not a candidate for speedy deletion? A good half of it is nonsense... --Brian1979 22:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's a real word, and fairly popular (75,000+ hits, with several articles) but the etymology is completely wrong and wiktionary already has a definition. Night Gyr 01:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. The article is incorrect in several places. Perhaps a transwiki would be right, but the article would have to be completely redone. Rory096 00:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
