Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chikkaveera Rajendra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 05:15, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chikkaveera Rajendra

Hi - This article has remained unsourced for a long time. It is one sentence about a novel based on some historical events - I don't think it should be retained in present form. Rama's Arrow 17:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Rama's Arrow 17:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete due to no content. Keep due to changes. Aplomado - UTC 17:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A stub article, non-encyclopædic. (aeropagitica)  18:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep & expand Editor has made a good effort at expanding this article in response to AfD. It now deserves a chance for further improvements to be made.  (aeropagitica)  17:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete In what sense is that an encyclopedia article? --Ricaud 00:19, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This new version is a clear keep. --Ricaud 23:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment This is a Jnanpith winning work by Maasti Venkatesh Ayengar. I have requested for help. Hopefully someone will improve this. Tintin (talk) 09:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment2 User:ImpuMozhi has created a stub and would expand it further in the next few days. Can the voters take another look at the article. Tintin (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Don't delete now that the subject has been established, hopefully you and ImpuMozhi will also add the sources. Rama's Arrow 14:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and continue to expand per feedback from AfD. AreJay 14:56, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, current status looks great. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 18:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It is now an acceptable stub, and I plan to expand it. ImpuMozhi 20:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.