Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherry Blossom Tattoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cherry Blossom Tattoo

Cherry Blossom Tattoo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Complete original research; reads like an essay; trivia John Reaves (talk) 08:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete—I agree with deleting the Cherry Blossom Tattoo article. Mike Trausch (fd0man, Talk Page) 08:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete junk. JuJube 08:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom Maustrauser 08:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I fail to see how there can be anything notable about this. The article seems to have been written to confirm that point of view. CiaranG 10:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete one of a zillion potential tattoo designs/subjects. I can't really see individual tattoo designs being encyclopedic anyway: we don't even have Heart tattoo or Skull tattoo, for example. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, essay, promotional, and copyvio. --Dhartung | Talk 17:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• delete per WP:OR. Static Universe 19:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete essay like and WP:OR so not notable enough for tattoo Thatperson 21:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - This is the sort of article that pisses me off. Not only shouldn't it have been created, there has been no effort to Wikify it. House of Scandal 11:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Non-notable tattoo design. Plus if nothing else the bit that states: It is easy to see why as the delicate nature of a cherry blossom and beauty of the flower makes a wonderful compliment to the natural beauty of a woman. makes it beyond saving. Who wrote this article, Swiss Toni?! Keresaspa 14:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, non-notable, massive POV problems, and one of so many possibilities for tattoo design, most of them probably being non-notable (unless someone actually gets the Wiki Logo/globe tattooed!!)SkierRMH 02:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per commenters above, read like original research material. Yamaguchi先生 00:40, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.