Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Shepard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-08 10:24Z

[edit] Chelsea Shepard

Chelsea Shepard (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:Two Moons Chelsea Shepard.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Second nomination. The first AfD debate resulted in keep after two keep votes unsupported by any sort of fact. The subject is an author of erotic fiction whose sole publications went through vanity presses. No sign of any reliable, non-trivial third party coverage. Pascal.Tesson 23:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete nn triviality. --Fire Star 火星 23:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I was going to vote keep if she were hot, but there's no pic of her, not even on her own webpage, nothing in GIS, and wikipedia is the top ranked hit. Nardman1 15:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Self-publications are not an indication of notability; often the opposite. Nothing here meeting WP:BIO and her books do not meet the WP:BK proposed guideline or, as cited in the nomination, our bedrock of reliable, non-trivial third-party coverage.--Fuhghettaboutit 19:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.