Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Pritt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. This article we be restubbed shortly if sources do not show up soon. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Charlotte Pritt
Unsupported, and uncited references and information. It is also full of biased information. WilliamC24 21:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non notable local politican. Needs a serious wikification if kept QuiteUnusual 22:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It's an ugly, unwikified article - looks like a resume and includes spam links for braingym.org etc. - but Pritt herself seems to be mildly notable as the victim of an alleged Republican smear campaign during her (failed) candidacy for Governor of West Virginia (see e.g. here). Cheers, Sam Clark 22:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Former members of US state legislatures are notable, and she's been through both houses. Article still needs cleanup. Melchoir 22:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, then recreate. Subject passed WP:N, but the article is pure spam. Nuke it outright and start over. --Aaron 22:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. She's notable. The article just needs some cleanup and some citations, as indicated by the page tags. It's no worse than thousands of other articles going through the normal development process. Fishboy 10:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It needs heavy cleanup but a good article will emerge more readily from this starting point than from a blank page. JamesMLane t c 10:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
