Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaotic Universe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chaotic Universe
I can't find evidence that this book even exists, let alone any third-party sources. Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 22:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- Original 8 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Genesis Saga (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Kris Wilson(fictional) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Daraun Givens (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Anna Vest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Brandi Blas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Tonya Muse (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Drasil Universe Saga (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Elemental Masters Saga (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Angela Haynes(fictional) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Chaotic Universe 2 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
--Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 22:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all... fails Google test, no publisher named, nothing findable. Nardman1 22:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete them all, I can't find a single thing on Google besides the Wikipedia entry. --awh (Talk) 22:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Move to user space? I'd hate to find out this is the only copy of the material this person has. There is clearly a lot of (misplaced) effort here.--Hobit 23:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- I admit that I felt a little bit of nominator's guilt with this one since it's clear this person went to so much effort. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 05:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete hoax or vanity. --Peta 23:25, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube 01:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of any sources SmokeyJoe 06:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- All this might be about a computer game that never left the design stage [1] which is, of course, no reason to keep it.--Tikiwont 15:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - could not find anything notable on Google either. However, the stuff is a bit too sophistacted for your average vanity/practical joke entry. Anyway, does not meet notability. HagenUK 19:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
