Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Changsha (poem)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as stub. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-27 02:30Z

[edit] Changsha (poem)

Changsha (poem) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

already in Wikisource Aran|heru|nar 12:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete — we are not Project Gutenberg. Privately, I am wondering whether the reason that the poem is considered `High Literature' by many Chinese, as the article says is the case, is not because they would have met with a dreadful accident involving a Type 59 and a public piazza if they'd said otherwise. Rosenkreuz 12:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Stubbify. Yes, it's a source text, but we can always write an encyclopedia article about it, and have a {{wikisourcepar}} tag. MER-C 12:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and mark as stub per MER-C. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 12:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and stub per above. Clearly an encyclopedic subject. schi ^talk 16:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and Cleanup Just H 17:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment Question on the copyright of the original text, as well as the translation - what is the source thereof (as translations are also subject to copyright laws) and would this apply? SkierRMH,23:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete --Turbothy 14:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.