Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centropy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. dbenbenn | talk 20:37, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Centropy
Article about a warez (pirated DVDs and software) crew. They do seem to be notable in the warez scene and on related websites, but i don't think they are encyclopaedic 21:38, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- VfD rationale submitted by User:Lady Tenar (unsigned). [1]
- Delete. Agreed. – flamurai (t) 21:46, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Warez groups do not seem encyclopedic. Zzyzx11 00:01, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Unlike Class (warez), listed below, Centropy does not seem to be notable enough to meet the bar. —Korath (Talk) 22:24, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. For one reason or another I did not see this when it was originally listed. Notability will be established in a few minutes. —RaD Man (talk) 15:37, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Notable group, crappy article stub. Give it time to expand. ALKIVAR™
16:20, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC) - Keep. Just because it's "not encyclopaedic" doesn't mean it should be deleted.. Big deal! It could be useful for someone.
- Unsigned by Splintax. It was his fourth edit. —Korath (Talk) 11:22, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Important group, has a large effect on the movie industry. This is important, to delete it would just be biased.--Maxwell C. 00:48, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
