Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celes Chère

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 20:38, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Celes Chère

Delete. Only ever appeared in one game. A Link to the Past (talk) 23:33, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

• STRONG KEEP:So? All of the other Final Fantasy characters have articles, and there's too much information to include in the main Final Fantasy VI article. There is nothing wrong with making separate articles for the main characters. Articles for NPCs are another issue however. If you ask me, all of these deletion nominations were made in very bad faith.PiccoloNamek 00:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Factually accurate, verifiable and notable. --Oldak Quill 01:09, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (or merge to Characters in Final Fantasy VI) per WP:FICT. Kirill Lokshin 01:35, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Quill --Ryan Delaney ^talk 01:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Oldak. Jtmichcock 01:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge in a list of FFVI characters. I promised myself I wouldn't mass-vote, but there's no point to keeping that promise now; they're all basically the same structurally, and after specific game info like lists of spells/attacks/etc. are removed, these are perfect list entries. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 02:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - This issue came up during the vote for speedy deletion. Just because a character is in one game, does not mean they are not significant enough to have their own article. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 04:04, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, silly fancruft. Martg76 07:46, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into Characters of Final Fantasy VI. Delete the GameFAQs-style material and it'll work, per A Man in Black. BrianSmithson 17:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep (or, relunctantly, Merge into an appropriate article): goodish or improveable article of a major character in a notable game, can't say why it shouldn't exist. And "only appeared in one game" is a pretty silly note since all Final Fantasy games are content-wise 95% different from each other. (And considering the vote for all characters is probably going to be voted keep/merge anyway and it's three AM here, in case anyone's reading and someone's counting these, I'd repeat this for all of the characters but I won't. Just saying this once because this article happened to be on my watchlist.) --Wwwwolf 00:25, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Per Ryan. Full-fledged articles work better here than a list would. --Kizor 10:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong merge definitely worth keeping as PART of an article --TimPope 10:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Notable Character from a Notable game. Verifiable. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 14:23, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Change my vote to Merge into Characters of Final Fantasy VI and Redirect. Seancdaug has done some great work with this article and has proved, against my expectations, that this would work as a list. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 21:46, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable major character in a major game. Too big to merge anywhere. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:48, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:59, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Along with all other main FF6 characters. PS. LttP, you didn't use the AFD tag properly. --HeroicJay 19:13, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge into List of Final Fantasy VI characters – Seancdaug 01:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
• STRONG KEEP This article is full of information on the character and it is a fair-sized one in its own right. If every FF6 character article were merged into one, it would make for too large a one going off on too many tangents. Cornince 00:31, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Have you looked at List of Final Fantasy VI characters? BrianSmithson 00:51, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.