Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Mario

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 23:48, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Mario

Gamecruft? Fanfiction! nn WCFrancis 23:12, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Created by same user as The Goom Scouts Halloween but this is a much fuller Super Mario article. The user appears to be working on quite a detailed project - see [1]. Dlyons493 00:05, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Nothing "Camp Mario" appears in any Mario canon that I can find, and the user is adding links to what appears to be his personal Web site. I believe this all may be candidates for speedy deletion as original research/fanfiction. FCYTravis 01:08, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
    • I looked all over the WP:CSD page to find the original research/fanfiction criteria, but it doesn't seem to be there. Which speedy criteria did this article meet? Pburka 02:44, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
    • Same question - didn't seem like a speedy to me. Dlyons493 16:26, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Fan fiction was a proposed CSD, but it failed to receive sufficient support. So, I've restored the page so we can see what we're voting on. JYolkowski // talk 20:49, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - as patently unencyclopedic. I can't believe this blind insistence on process over common sense. FCYTravis 22:00, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. But process is important. I suggest you stop playing with your deletion button and exercise a bit more restraint and patience, as befits one who has been chosen by his peers to act as an administrator. Pburka 23:06, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • It seems that cruftpage sockpuppets aren't the only ones who don't get the joke. Perhaps I need to make it more explicit. But I figured people here had enough of a sense of humor to render such a disclaimer superfluous. FCYTravis 01:32, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy There's a lot of work gone into this and it may end up being notable. Comment I was originally under the mistaken impression that it was part of the Mario canon, which would have made it a Keep, but by the time FCYTravis reported it wasn't, and I went to check, the article had been deleted. I suggest categorising that as blind insistence on process over common sense is uncalled for. Dlyons493 23:20, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. There is enough stuff there to make it worth keeping. --2mcm 00:35, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.