Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Kee Tov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:59, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Kee Tov

Notability not established CobaltBlueTony 13:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep Information in the article meets WP:V. Google search also shows more than a 1,000 hits as well. Moreover, it is notable in a local scale. This camp accomodates more than 700 Jewish childern in California. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete (or merge, but don't know where). There is recent precedent to avoid pages for specific camps, but that pages for groupings of camps (sponsored by a certain organization or having a certain affiliation) are reasonable if that information cannot comfortably fit in the pages of those sponsors/affiliations. That decision was for the regional and national overnight camps sponsored by the parent organization of the one for the page at hand here. Those camps have much broader geographic appeal, are of comparable size, and some have several thousand ghits. "Best Jewish Day Camp in the East Bay" feels like pretty slim notability. The page has very little that sounds specific/unique and interesting to this camp for anyone but those directly involved. It's heavy on the details to the point that it sounds like an ad or the camp's own website. Maybe we need a California Day-Camps or a URJ Day Camps page? DMacks 17:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Camps are usually businesses, so WP:CORP would apply, but this appears to be clearly part of a religious organization, so WP:ORG might apply instead. The article has no evidence or assertion of meeting either standard, so delete. GRBerry 00:33, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per GRBerry. JoshuaZ 00:44, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. -- GRBerry 00:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN biz. Not even a school. No published works of any kind about this organization. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge per User:DMacks and the precedent cited. We recently decided to have a single section on Reform camps in URJ#Camps rather than having articles on them individually. There doesn't seem to be any reason not to apply that precedent here. Although this camp is operated by a Reform congregation rather than URJ itself, there's no reason not to have another section in URJ#Camps on synagogue-operated Reform camps consistent with the format (which could also indicate the congregation operating them, location, size, other very brief information). If this camp is notable it can get a brief paragraph in addition to a mention in the list. --Shirahadasha 04:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Summer camps are generally not notable! Vegaswikian 02:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless more evidence can be found to suppoert noteability -m Blood red sandman 15:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.