Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camberwell Grammar School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep as nomination made in bad faith by an anonymous vandal. Capitalistroadster 05:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Camberwell Grammar School

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a domain for schools to freely advertise themselves to others. It is highyl inappropriate that this should occur where others should have access to information rather than marketing history. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.217.24.204 (talk • contribs).
• Keep. Obviously. Prominent Australian school. Nominations like this just waste everyone's time. Cnwb 04:14, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I actually considered a delete vote until I saw the nominator's vandalism of said page... Deltabeignet 04:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Comment. This nomination was made by 138.217.24.204, whose vandalism of Camberwell Grammar School can be seen here. And even more, committed after the nomination was made, here. Cnwb 04:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Comment This AfD was obviously made in bad faith and should be thrown out. Let's not waste our time. pfctdayelise 04:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This nomination is a bad faith nomination by an anonymous editor. The article is in good shape when not being vandalised by the nominator.Capitalistroadster 04:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, although I just had to revert out a large slab of the article because it was a copyvio from a school publication. See talk. --bainer (talk) 05:03, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• keep and please close down this nomination it is anonymous and in bad faith Yuckfoo 05:07, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.