Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRM32Pro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 19:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CRM32Pro

A minor software development kit. A Google search says it has 26,000 hits, but only 52 are unique. The website's Alexa rank is somewhere near two million, and there are no independent third party publications about the kit or anything derived from it, making it unverifiable. This software doesn't meet criteria in WP:SOFTWARE and doesn't seem to meet inclusion criteria regarding notability in general. Wafulz 00:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As per nom, as well as the fact that it sounds more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article "And do not forget that everything is free.". Canadian-Bacon ^{t c e} 01:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam and per above. MER-C 08:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. As it is now, it definitely sounds like promotional. Though it's a free software project, also available for no money. So that is not commercial by essence. But, as it is now it really lacks notability. Is this SDK used in famous games, or hase it been used in modeling or something really notable AND external to the project itself ? Whithout some more info that's a weak delete. A purple wikiuser 21:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Reads like promotional material and does not appear to be notable. --dtony 23:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete , no third party sources. —Nate Scheffey 02:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Note, by the way, that the article was created by User:RobertoPP; googling "CRM32Pro Roberto" is revealing. Michael Kinyon 12:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.