Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CP Lacertae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep, nominator is trolling. -- Curps 06:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CP Lacertae

what is an anova? give some description or people think its no-sense article--Cr0w bar 04:50, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The first sentence links to nova, and a nova is significant. moink 05:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable as astronomical event. —ERcheck @ 05:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable astronomical event. Capitalistroadster 05:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, novae are significant. As moink said, the first sentence links to the main article on novae, and lacking a full description is usually not grounds for deletion. Bad ideas 05:22, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. From here, you seem to be nominating a lot of articles without even reading them before doing so... ? --Kinu 06:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. This is clearly a notable article for an astronomical phenomenon that meets any and all criteria for retention. Something must be done regarding Cr0w bar, who seems to have no understanding of the AfD process and has kicked off AfDs for almost a dozen articles with little apparent understanding of the articles or the AfD process, which would be considered vanadlism if applied directly to the article. Let's put a stop to this nonsense. Alansohn 06:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.