Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CONCEPT 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] CONCEPT 5
This article concerns a rumored new store chain from Abercrombie & Fitch. Despite requests for sources there are none. If the nonexistent, rumored chain ever becomes an actual, notable chain then it will probably have a different name anyway. Will Beback · † · 22:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wait, it has a source! A A&F staff meetin! That's good enough for me! (sarcasm). I can't see anything worth this article. WP is not a crystal ball, Delete. Dåvid ƒuchs (talk • contribs) 23:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above WP:NOT comments. In addition, a staff meeting most definitely fails WP:V in every way possible. Soltak | Talk 00:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Crystalballing, etc. Not only that, but if the author was present at such a meeting, there would also be conflict of interest issues. Leebo86 05:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. There seems to be some press for Concept 5, for example here and here, but it certainly doesn't confirm the specific nature of the venture. Wikipedia not being a crystal ball, it's hard to confirm notability for something that doesn't exist yet. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above (WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V, etc). robwingfield «T•C» 23:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
