Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CED Videodisc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Selectavision. Whilst it doesn't matter in this particular case, generally one should not redirect the article during an AfD unless the target article then becomes the subject of the AfD. -Splash^talk 00:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] CED_Videodisc

Redundant with Videodisc and Selectavision, bad fmt, factually inaccurate (LaserDisc did not fail, it was brought out by JVC at the same time as RCA brought out Selectavision). Seems like a weak fork attempt. Keith D. Tyler ¶ 19:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Selectavision. Jkelly 22:12, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Selectavision. --Metropolitan90 03:29, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

It's worth noting that the creator has issued a new version, which was not so much a correction as a rewording. It's still factually inaccurate, and now has spelling and grammar errors. And it's still redundant with Selectavision, which it somehow suggests is a different topic. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 05:32, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Going ahead with a redirect, which doesn't require waiting. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 18:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.