Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CD-adapco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mangojuice^talk 16:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] CD-adapco

Contested prod which does not assert the notability of the subject (a company). MER-C 09:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - spam and vanity from single-purpose user account. BTLizard 09:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Sorry, I was in the process of adding the article, I'll try and correct the mistakes, but I don't accept that this is any different to the entry for any other commercial company such as ANSYS or Oracle Corporation. CD-adapco is one of the few companys mentioned on Computational Fluid Dynamics that does not have an entry of its own. StephenFerguson 10:55, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment The difference, Mr Ferguson, is that the articles on ANSYS and Oracle are not written by anybody connected with the companies in question. While admittedly, you might not be related with CD-adapco, the fact that this is your first edit of the Wikipedia strongly suggests this opinion. Wikipedia is not an advertising medium. If you are here legitimately, then I'd advise you to start with other less controversial topics to edit, and build up a healthy list of contribs before starting to branch out into areas that may seem like self-promotion. --Roninbk 11:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - fails to contain any sourcing that shows compliance with WP:CORP. BlueValour 23:09, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.